it is only in ourselves it does not exist at all in the others. And if this be true, why do others see sin in us ? They must according to the theory be just the same kind of sinners as we are. The fact that they see wrong in us proves that the same wrong exists in them, while according to our belief the wrong does not exist in them, but exists only in ourselves. We must admit, therefore, that the wrong we see is not simply in ourselves, but also in others, otherwise the belief would not hold good all around. Nevertheless, if we admit this we contradict the very idea upon which the belief is based, proving that the whole thing is but an illusion. We may imagine that others have certain wrongs that they have not, but the fact that we imagine these wrongs existing in others does not prove that these wrongs exist at all, either in others or in ourselves. For, suppose we see in others what is not there; suppose we imagine others having certain failings because we have them; suppose some of us at times do this; does that prove that the pure mind is unable to see what is not pure? It does not. It simply proves that when the imagination is not under control we may imagine many things that do not have existence anywhere.

When your eyes are open you will see everything that is to be seen, be it black or white. And the mind that is pure certainly has the same power to see with open eyes, that the mind has that is not